Wednesday, July 31, 2019

In The Bishop's Carriage (1904)





Author, Mariam Michelson, gives you a new way of reading a book. Instead of using a third person voice to introduce characters, she allows her main character, Nance Olden, to give you the rundown on all the folks. This style of having one character tell you about an encounter with someone and then repeat in her own voice what the person is saying, as if questioning their response or commenting on it, is brilliant. Confusing at first, but brilliant none the less.

Usually I don’t like hearing one character do all the describing and talking in a book, but this author won me over with her almost gossipy way of doing it. Also, the fact that she uses primarily one main partner to the main character, Maggie Monahan (Mag),  as primary receiver of her self-talking dialogues makes you feel as if you are part of their specially bonded friendship.

Nance and Mag grew up in “The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children” house, or as they called the loveless orphanage, The Cruelty. Nance and Mag become seasoned thieves and Nance hooks up with a brutish man (Tom) who uses her to help pull off his small-time crimes.

The story takes off immediately and you always find yourself rooting for Nance to come out on top of the many challenging escapades she finds herself caught up in. Her encounter “in the bishop’s carriage,” where she first meets the bishop, begins an enlightening and life changing jump off point for Nance. In the bishop she finds a loving fatherly type and in Nance the bishop finds a loving daughter. But circumstances and bad luck of the thief haunts Nance as she struggles with this newly discovered feeling of wanting to be a good girl for her fantasy-adopted father, or at least not let him find out who/what she really is.

Only after the brute Tom Dorgan, who Nance thought she loved, is sent away to sing-sing prison, does she consider changing her ways.

She’s a bad girl trying to do good, and once she realizes how much she likes being good, honest and trusted by others, she begins to blossom. Nance becomes a successful comedy star of the stage, using her mimicking ways to make satire of famous celebs of the day.

It’s almost as if Nance has traded in a bad thief for a good theatrical agent in Fred Obermuller. Fred shows Nance how to trust in him by trusting in her time and time again. Surprisingly, by the end of the book the two fall in-love and marry, something that might have been hinted at in the story but really couldn’t be seen coming.

Part of the story is Fred saving Nance and another part is Nance saving Fred. And all the while in between you’re hearing episode after episode of events being described and shared with Mag from Nance’s point of view.

Think I might have figured out how the author put together the story and came up with the title. I read online, the book originated from a short story printed in the newspaper titled “In the Bishop’s Carriage.” The short story consisted of only the first chapter. In the book the second chapter mentions Mag for the first time and The third chapter begins with:

“Oh, Mag, Mag, for heaven’s sake, let me talk to you! You must let me tell you. No – don’t call the other girls. I can’t bear to tell this to anybody but you.” Pg62

And there begins the uniqueness of “In the Bishop’s Carriage.” The two women are like childhood girlfriends who’ve grown to love and trust only each other. Though Mag never says a word herself, Nance gives the reader enough to know that Mag is one of those friends who listens well, rarely questions and is loyal in her commitment to secrecy. Not sure what Mag’s standing was with Nance while Tom was around, but with Tom out of the picture, Mag becomes Nance’s connection to her past orphanage childhood and hard life existence to this point.

Some of the memorable characters are the silken voiced Mr. Latimer, a wheelchair bound invalid who Nance encounters while escaping a theft. Mr. Latimer covers for Nance with the cops, shares with her some prophetic poetry, and enlightens her by questioning why she lives a life of lying and thievery when she seems to have so much talent for good. Mr. Latimer basically sets the moral stage for why one chooses good over evil. And if Mr. Latimer is the good shepherd, the wretched Edward was the snake in the garden. Edward’s criminal plot to marry the old spinster Dowager for her money was foiled by Nance, and from then on it is Edward who becomes Nance’s nemesis, trying to ruin her success throughout the story.

Twelve-year old Kitty the thief steals the purse of Nance and is then found sharing with other street-urchins candy and cake bought with Nance’s stolen money. Kitty reminds Nance of herself. Eventually Nance gains her trust and teaches Kitty a lesson in why not to steal.

The Trust was an interesting part of the story. The Trust being the monopolizing corporate entity of the theatrical business. It was the organization that Fred Obermuller had bumped heads with and felt he could never get ahead because of them. Nance pulls a great hustle on the Trust lead man Mr. Tausig, ending with the incriminating document that can bring down the Trust for what was then a big deal, with anti-trust laws going into effect to stop big business monopolies in industries like railroads, oil, etc…

All ends well in this book as Nance and Fred become successful world travelers and giving to the needy. At the end when Nance and the bishop meet where it all began, in the bishop’s carriage, you feel as if the story has come full circle and much more is understood about the journey. Then seeing Nance return to the Cruelty, bringing toys for the little kids as she almost faints from the bad memories. I believe it is Fred, knowing the nightmares the Cruelty has haunted Nance with, who helps her see that her doing this good charity work is making sure no more kids coming through the doors of the Charity will have to suffer like she and Mag did. In one stroke of good intentions, Nance was able to whisk away the dark, gloomy childhood thoughts imprisoned in her memory of the Cruelty, and replace them with a happy outlook for the kids now living there.



In the Bishop’s Carriage is a rags-to-riches story, a good-triumphs-over-evil story, a crime and mystery thriller story and a comedy. Author Miriam Michelson ranks on the level of the early suffragists members in the way she challenges convention and pits the wits of a smart woman against the custom and convention of a male dominated society.



Yes, I rooted from beginning to end for the kindly thief Nance Olden!

Book Notes

-        He looked like an unhealthy little frog, with his bald head, his thin-lipped mouth that laughed, while the wrinkles rayed away from his cold, sneering eyes that had no smile in them. Pg.214

-        The little fellow laughed. His is a creaky, almost silent little laugh; if a spider could laugh he’d laugh like that. Pg.215

-        The thing to do is to be humble if you can’t be arrogant. Pg.211

- your face is unprotected with eyes closed; like a fort whose battery is withdrawn. Pg.185




*    Three times I came across references to a black person(s). In a reflection of the times, the words used were not considered racist and offensive to many whites; but to most blacks they were racist and offensive then and continue to be today.:

-  "There I was seated in a box all alone, come to listen to the leading lady sing coon-songs. Pg. 175

-        Oh Mag, remember how we used to peep into those awful, imposing Board rooms! Remember how strange and resentful you felt – like a poor little red-haired nigger up at the block – when you were in there to be shown to the woman who’d called to adopt you. Pg.276




In The Bishop’s Carriage

By Miriam Michelson

Audio

Silent Film (lost)

Sunday, July 28, 2019

You’d Do It For Randolph Scott!



Today I tuned into the western tv station GRIT, where a Randolph Scott movie marathon was being broadcast. Scott was a little before my time. The first time I heard his name was in the 1970’s Mel Brooks comedy, “Blazing Saddles.” For those who can remember the scene, “You’d do it for Randolph Scott. Rannndolllph Sccotttt!,” its just one of the many hysterical episodes in the movie. But for us kids watching back then, we were all kind of in the dark, wondering, who the heck is Randolph Scott? I remember laughing along with the older folks watching, assuming he must’ve been some cowboy from their era of television and radio. I wasn’t far off in my assumption.

Randolph Scott was an early American film actor who became known for playing the tough lawman in westerns. Though his acting was a bit stiff, he was tall, athletic, and considered ruggedly handsome; perfect for the western hero role. He was John Wayne before John Wayne and Clint Eastwood before Clint Eastwood. He did more talking with his fists and guns than with his low, monotone voice. A simple, no-nonsense hero with high values, who stood for truth and justice.

In the two movies I watched, “Tall Man Riding” and “Riding Shotgun,” he was misjudged by both good and bad. His quiet demeanor was sometimes taken for cowardice, weakness, or in the case of women, cold-heartedness. But in the end, he is always proven a good, strong, stand-up man. 

He seldom smiles and rarely shows any emotion, but you know he always wants what’s right and just. His smile is more of a hint of a smile, like a smirk, never splitting the tight-lipped vice of his mug.



What got me into watching Randolph Scott movies is my crazy obsession as an Oakland Raiders fan. Anything Raiders gets my blood and passion going. Years ago, I learned that the Raiders used the image of Randolph Scott for the eye-patched pirate logo emblazoned on the sides of their silver helmets. The logo, with a few modifications, has been that way since the team joined the NFL in 1960

Looking at the pirate logo alongside a picture of Randolph Scott, the resemblance is confirmed; squinty-eyed, prominent nose, thin-lipped and square-jawed. So you can imagine a fan of the Raiders pirate seeing him riding into town on horse-back, looking tall and tough as nails, fearing nobody and ready to fight at the drop of a hat. That’s a Raiders Fan image of just who the Raiders are and that's the character Randolph Scott portrayed in his movies. It's really a sight to behold as a fan.

I recommend to any Raiders fan to give it a try. Check out a 1950’s Randolph Scott western, preferably in color. You’ll be a better fan for it, knowing the Raiders pirate mystique actually represented a high-caliber individual on the right side of the law. We ain't all pillaging crooks! Coincidently, Scott's last name in the movie "Tall Man Riding" was Madden.

I once heard Al Davis in an interview say he styled the Raiders after two of his favorite New York sports teams; the Yankees for their talent and domination and the Dodgers for their ruggedness and tenacity. I suppose the image of Randolph Scott was chosen for the same reasons. Al Davis was a man who appreciated greatness. He was a visionary, crafty enough to mold the Raiders into the competitive sports greatness he’d observed growing up in Brooklyn. 

RaidersWire: Training Camp Day One

Monday, July 22, 2019

SF Giants Comeback Downs Cubs



Panik Stuns the Cubs (san jose mercury news)

The Giants now own a 51-50 record, and how they climbed out of the cellar is CRAZY! It's their first time above .500 this season and they sport a 15-3 record so far in the month of July.

Tonight's game against the visiting Chicago Cubs saw the home team once again rally from a deficit. Trailing 4-2 in the bottom of the 8th, they scored 3 runs before closing out the victory in the 9th.  One of tonight's heroes of the moment was Joe Panik, who batted in the go ahead run. 

Resilient Pitching, attention to details Fielding and clutch Hitting are signs of a championship caliber team. The San Francisco Giants are checking off all three boxes more times than not when they take the field to play ball. Tonight the Cubbies saw what we Giants fans are all hyped and 5150-CRAZY about. Baseball in San Francisco is back to being competitive. And the Bochy Farewell Tour is alive and swell...…….

Go Giants!

Final Score
Cubs 4
Giants 5

Sunday, July 21, 2019

Championship Boxing with Class


Last night we boxing fans saw two Boxing Gladiators go the distance and remind us of what the sweet science of pugilism is all about.  We saw a legendary 40 year old champion go toe-to-toe with a returning 30 year old champion. Their combative performance made some of the younger boxing matches of late resemble a dance marathon; no constant clutching and circling around the ring in this bout. The battle was on from start to finish. 

These champions came to do what they do best; fight. The bout was entertaining and clean, and was judged somewhat fairly. What impressed me most was the class and respect of both fighters afterward. The losing, younger fighter was honest and dignified in answering questions about his performance, while at the same time giving praise to the older champion. If we boxing fans have felt cheated and bamboozled by championship fights in past years, last night did much toward making up for all the disappointments and questionable decisions endured.

Dignity and Class was on the Boxing menu last night, not to mention a punching festival that thrilled from round 1 to the bell ending round 12.  And though I went into the fight not knowing much about the younger fighter, he earned my respect and fandom with his skill, character and love for the sport. Even in losing, he just might be the one to carry the championship torch into the very near future. 

As for the older fighter, he proved to me and the rest of the boxing universe that he still has the skills to take on championship caliber opponents and not only hold is own, but come out convincingly victorious. His legacy is still in the making.

Congratulations to two great ambassadors of the sport of boxing. I also give a championship salute to the promoters who put together a match made for us admirers of the sweet science.

         1964 - 2019

10 strikes on the bell for a former champion who's life ended way too soon; Pernell "Sweet Pea" Whitaker.




Thursday, July 18, 2019

Church of Scientology - Lest We Forget

25 of the biggest lies told by L. Ron Hubbard and the Church of Scientology (Tony Ortega 2015)

Notice the heading doesn't say Only 25, but "25 of the Biggest Lies." Mr. Ortega's listing is worth a look-see for those who wonder what all the fuss is about this organization.

So this is why there are so many skeptics and haters out there when it comes to the Church of Scientology. I had no idea that the founder, L. Ron Hubbard, was a pathological liar and his wife, Mary Sue Hubbard, was sent to jail with eight other members of the church for Obstructing Justice and stealing government documents. Ever heard of "Operation Snow White"? Just ask any Scientologist. Then again, maybe you shouldn't ask.

I haven't researched much about L. Ron Hubbard, but from what I've found so far there was nothing holy about the man. Sounds more like a crooked snake-oil businessman who inspired followers with falsehoods while pocketing their money. Picture a cross-hatching of Donald Trump  and Jim Jones; and sadly there's always lost souls willing to drink the kool-aide. 

The Church of Scientology's "Operation Snow White" was the organization's failed criminal conspiracy attempt to cover up Hubbard's dark history. Again, another example where the cover-up is worse than the crime. 



Jump to navigation Jump to search

Scientology building in Los Angeles, California.
Operation Snow White was a criminal conspiracy by the Church of Scientology during the 1970s to purge unfavorable records about Scientology and its founder, L. Ron Hubbard


Biographies


A man wearing a white t-shirt stands with the words "Canadien National" visible behind him.
Gerry Armstrong, formerly Hubbard's official biographical researcher, whose trial disclosed many details of Hubbard's life

In the late 1970s two men began to assemble a picture of Hubbard's life. Michael Linn Shannon, a resident of Portland, Oregon, became interested in Hubbard's life story after an encounter with a Scientology recruiter. Over the next four years he collected previously undisclosed records and documents. He intended to write an exposé of Hubbard and sent a copy of his findings and key records to a number of contacts but was unable to find a publisher.[321]
Shannon's findings were acquired by Gerry Armstrong, a Scientologist who had been appointed Hubbard's official archivist.[321] He had been given the job of assembling documents relating to Hubbard's life for the purpose of helping Omar V. Garrison, a non-Scientologist who had written two books sympathetic to Scientology, to write an official biography. However, the documents that he uncovered convinced both Armstrong and Garrison that Hubbard had systematically misrepresented his life. Garrison refused to write a "puff piece" and declared that he would not "repeat all the falsehoods they [the Church of Scientology] had perpetuated over the years". He wrote a "warts and all" biography while Armstrong quit Scientology, taking five boxes of papers with him. The Church of Scientology and Mary Sue Hubbard sued for the return of the documents while settling out of court with Garrison, requiring him to turn over the nearly completed manuscript of the biography.[322] In October 1984 Judge Paul G. Breckenridge ruled in Armstrong's favor, saying:

The evidence portrays a man who has been virtually a pathological liar when it comes to his history, background and achievements. The writings and documents in evidence additionally reflect his egoism, greed, avarice, lust for power, and vindictiveness and aggressiveness against persons perceived by him to be disloyal or hostile. At the same time it appears that he is charismatic and highly capable of motivating, organizing, controlling, manipulating and inspiring his adherents. He has been referred to during the trial as a "genius," a "revered person," a man who was "viewed by his followers in awe." Obviously, he is and has been a very complex person and that complexity is further reflected in his alter ego, the Church of Scientology.[323]

In November 1987, the British journalist and writer Russell Miller published Bare-faced Messiah, the first full-length biography of L. Ron Hubbard. He drew on Armstrong's papers, official records and interviews with those who had known Hubbard including ex-Scientologists and family members. The book was well-received by reviewers but the Church of Scientology sought unsuccessfully to prohibit its publication on the grounds of copyright infringement.[324] Other critical biographical accounts are found in Bent Corydon's L. Ron Hubbard, Messiah or Madman? (1987) and Jon Atack's A Piece of Blue Sky (1990).


Burglaries and Lies Paved a Path to Prison
5 Scientologists get Jail Term in Plot on Files
Donald Trump is the L. Ron Hubbard of Politics


Dated


A poster of Scientology founder L Ron Hubbard, supplied by Keryn, 55. Keryn grew up in the church and has told ABC News Online she was a victim of 'hard labor, mental brutality and separation' on their ships. She is angry the motion for a Scientology probe has been blocked in Parliament.

Tuesday, July 16, 2019

Congressional Grand Slam


Responding to the threatening and hateful speech of the man occupying a seat in the White House, these four young congresswomen hit the ball out of the park. We need no longer focus on such hate speech after being told by these brilliant congresswomen why they were targeted and how they will NOT take the bait. They refused to hatefully respond to what was viewed as a Racist and Terror mongering attack on them and immigrant citizens of our country, and in so doing gave more dignity to their cause, party and position as the new blood in a party of Democrats.

It was a proud, uplifting and uniting moment to behold in today's American political landscape. And if you don't stop to look and weigh the significance of this historic moment you might miss something very special happening in this great country.




A-p-p-l-a-u-s-e




Crawford’s Giant Day


San Francisco Giants Shortstop Brandon Crawford had a baseball day for the ages as he batted in 8 runs during a 19-2 win over the Colorado Rockies. Sure the game was played in hitter friendly Coors Field, and the rumors of juiced balls this season might have purist baseball fans rolling their eyes at Crawford’s gargantuan feat. But I say to baseball fans, don’t let the naysayers fool you. 8 RBI’s in a 9 inning baseball game is a rare and honorable accomplishment in any era of the sport. 

History proves that Crawford’s day in baseball comes around as often as some meteoric comets visit our planet’s orbit; once in a lifetime. Which always brings us to the Ferris Buehler words of wisdom quote:





As the NL West last place San Francisco Giants continue to play winning baseball in July, they will have a few tough choices to make come the trading deadline. After today's game(s) one of those choices is whether to keep the meteoric bat of Brandon Crawford rotating through the Giants lineup or send him off to some other teams’ orbit in hopes of getting a good return on the trade. As with stars and objects streaking through the galaxy, time will tell.   

In the meantime, let us not get caught speculating and possibly miss a chance to witness history of some sort play out in front of our eyes once again this season.  After all, the 8 RBI Crawford feat happened in game 1 of a double header. In game 2 he added his 3rd home run on the day as the Giants won it 2-1. Craw and the Giants might be in the cellar of their division, but it’s sure entertaining to watch them try to scratch and claw their way toward the surface of October contention. Such is life in the world of baseball. Such is life....

Go Giants! 


note: 
Rockies broadcast scribbles out embarrassing score
Giants feed their run differential, beat Rockies 19-2
Giants offense posts historic numbers