Wednesday, August 19, 2026

Django - A Tarantino Classic

Original Motion Picture Soundtrack
"Django" - Composed by Luis Bacalov

After revisiting the movie Django Unchained, I have nothing but admiration for the creativity and genius of filmmaker Quentino Tarantino. The characters, the dialogue and the violent cruelness of some scenes make it a classic tribute to Western films past. And the main theme song, an original from the 1966 film Django, should be tops on any list of western theme songs.

The genius is recognizable right from the beginning, when Tarantino inserts slavery, race and revenge into the plot along with his uniquely hinted humor. To watch a Tarantino film is to sit back, suspend belief, and let your senses take in an unfiltered collage of place, time, peoples and circumstances.

If nothing else, Tarantino should be remembered as the filmmaker who revolutionized the "N"-word in film. From an older generation, who rightly attach so much violent hatred to this word, hats off to a younger generation for somewhat declawing the word and rendering it less harmful by using it in a fraternal/brotherly context.

But to know the history of the word is to know what a person today means when using it. One should know the social context associated with how a person addresses another. When it comes to the "N"-word, its history alone distorts its use and meaning today. 

Personally, I do not use the word. But I'm more aware and sensitive to the manner in which someone addresses me than the words they use to address me. Yes, words matter. But as we have seen with the "N"-word, when a word is used in a slang context, its social relevance has been altered by those using it in that context. Meanwhile, those so offended by the ugly history associated with the word continue to find its use in any context offensive.

As for Quentino Tarantino's over the top use of the "N"-word in his films, I believe his creative artistry puts the viewer's thoughts and conscience on trial, where he/she is the judge/jury/plaintiff/defendant all wrapped up into one. Each viewer must battle with their own inner feelings about how the word was used and what emotions arose in them by hearing its use over and over again. I doubt those who find the word vulgar regardless of context can comfortably sit through a Tarantino film. Then again, maybe Tarantino is all about making viewers uncomfortable about violent and cruel behaviors that were once acceptable. 

Chattel Slavery was legal in what is now the United States of America for 246 years.

Do remember, Django is a creation of historical fiction for entertainment purposes. It is you, as a living, breathing being with a mind, body and emotions tethered to your own history that movies like Django can awaken awareness in. There is so much more to this classic Western movie than just one word. But without the "N"-word's use, in its slavery-era context, I doubt this film would have had and continues to have such an impact on its viewing audience.

Analyzing Evil: Stephen From Django Unchained

Not you, Stephen. You right where you belong

note: for my late brother Will, who loved Westerns and enjoyed every moment of watching Django!


Instagram yamlittle_mba
There’s a powerful moment in Django Unchained where Stephen, the house slave played by Samuel L. Jackson, sees Django riding a horse and immediately becomes furious. Not because Django did anything wrong, but because the image itself violates the order Stephen had internalized. A Black man moving freely, confidently, outside the hierarchy he had accepted. That moment wasn’t just about anger. It was about conditioning.

I thought about that scene when I saw the old clip from the Ricky Lake show where two Black men are arguing about racism. One is speaking honestly about still feeling the weight of profiling and discrimination. The other says racism may exist but we should just ignore it and focus on Black people harming each other instead.

Both are reacting to the same history, but from very different places.

One says you can acknowledge racism and still strive, still build, still succeed while understanding the system you’re navigating. The other says success requires pretending the system doesn’t exist at all.

But the deeper issue is how the conversation turns inward and becomes a fight between us. That’s the legacy that stretches all the way back to slavery. Systems that conditioned people to compete, distrust, and police one another while the larger structure remained intact.

Stephen’s anger at Django wasn’t just a character moment. It was a metaphor. Internalized hierarchy can make people defend the very structure that once oppressed them. And when that conditioning carries forward through generations, the argument becomes less about the system and more about each other.

The real challenge isn’t deciding whether racism exists or pretending it doesn’t. The challenge is recognizing the history of how we were conditioned and refusing to let that conditioning turn us against each other.

Awareness and success are not opposites. You can acknowledge reality and still rise above it.

Disclaimer: This post contains commentary on historical themes, media, and social dynamics for educational and discussion purposes.


Tuesday, August 04, 2026

Shame vs Guilt / Honor vs Righteousness




excerpt from Essays on Ethics by Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
- Guilt, not shame

All societies need a shared moral code. They all therefore need a process of socialisation. But not all do this in the same way. The anthropologist Ruth Benedict made a fundamental distinction between shame cultures and guilt cultures. In shame cultures the highest value is honour. In guilt cultures it is righteousness, "doing what is right because it is right." In shame cultures, morality functions through a sense of what others expect from you. Shame itself is the sense of the disgrace we would suffer if others found out what we have done. Guilt has nothing to do with opinions of others and everything to do with the voice of conscience. Shame cultures are other-directed. Guilt cultures are inner-directed.

This has significant consequences. One who has been shamed has been marked, tainted, stigmatised. The only way of escaping shame is to leave and live elsewhere or, in extremis, to commit suicide. Guilt cultures are different because they draw a sharp distinction between the agent and the act, the sinner and the sin. The act may be wrong, but the agent remains untainted, intact. As we say in our morning prayers, "The soul You gave me is pure," even if I have done things that are impure. Thus, in guilt cultures, there is always the possibility of remorse, repentance, atonement, and forgiveness. We can mend broken relationships. We can atone for sins. We can apologise and be forgiven. What we did does not hold us eternally captive. What we do in the future can atone for what we did in the past. A guilt culture is a morality of freedom. A shame culture is a morality of conformity and social control.

Much has been written about Genesis 2-3, the story of the first humans in the Garden of Eden and the first sin, eating from the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge. Few, however, have understood that it is actually a story about the difference between guilt and shame. Bernard Williams, in Shame and Necessity, points out that shame is essentially a visual phenomenon. When you feel shame, you are experiencing or imagining what it is like to be seen doing what you did by others. The first instinct on feeling shame is to wish to be invisible or elsewhere. Guilt, by contrast, is more a phenomenon of hearing than one of seeing. It represents the inner voice of conscience. Becoming invisible or transported to somewhere else may assuage shame, but it has no effect on guilt. The voice goes with you, wherever you are.

Seven Features of Jewish Ethics

1. The dignity of the individual

2. Human freedom

3. The sanctity of life

4. Guilt, not shame

5. Loyalty and love

6. The ethics of covenant

7. The dual covenant


  • Judaism: A faith and way of life centered on the Torah, divine commandments (mitzvot), and spiritual relationship with God. Historically, traditional belief held that the return to the Land of Israel would occur through divine messianic intervention rather than human political action. 
  • Zionism: A movement formalized by figures like Theodor Herzl in the 1890s in response to European antisemitism, asserting that Jewish people—like other nations—have the right to national self-determination and sovereignty.
  • Rabbi Jonathan Sacks on cancel culture, restoring morality and Israel’s missed opportunities | Jewish Rhode Island

    Sunday, August 02, 2026

    The Dreyfus Affair (French History)

     

    novelist Robert Harris on "An Officer and a Spy"


    "The Dreyfus Affair: A Lesson for Our Time," presented by Joseph Gal, PhD, MS



    1859 - 1935

    French artillery officer of Jewish descent, wrongfully convicted of treason. Sentenced first to life imprisonment on Devil's Island penal colony. Sentenced a second time to 10 years but later exonerated. Antisemitism and a French military coverup were motives behind his wrongful convictions. 

    Corruption: When U See Something, Say Nothing!

     


    SAN FRANCISCO, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Capital One Financial (COF.N)

    , opens new tab hit back on Friday against a lawsuit over its decision to close ‌the Trump Organization's bank accounts years ago, stating that it did so after a review by anti-money laundering experts.
    The disclosure marks the first time a bank has formally tied money laundering concerns to U.S. President Donald Trump's family business. Capital One is seeking to dismiss ​the case by casting doubt on claims of illegally debanking — or denying services on religious or political grounds — ​the Trump Organization.

    Capital One says it closed Trump Organization's accounts after anti-money laundering probe | Reuters


    And here we are as American citizens 2026, watching helplessly as a government we once suspected of corrupt, greedy, unfair practices now flaunt their disregard for rule of law in plain sight for all to see. Democratic foreign governments understood early the "Quid pro quo" policies being pushed to do business in America and have taken steps to offset any losses. 

    Meanwhile, American citizens are left feeling the squeeze not only financially, but in their all-around health, as well as the health of the country. 

    - Because of an underlying propensity to be greedy, and because the human condition seeks advantage, there is no shortage of corruption — and its pernicious consequences — in the contemporary universe. But no political jurisdiction can function on behalf of its citizens and stakeholders if its leaders and middle managers are focused on private gain rather than public enrichment. Instead, bridges collapse, roads crumble, food is tainted, organs are peddled for profit, police self-enrich at roadblocks, marriage and birth certificates become costly, and the very fundamentals of a safe and secure life are compromised.

    The Baleful Consequences of Corruption | The MIT Press Reader


    And yet we still see those corrupt ones in high government positions continue to lie, excuse, and defer in order to avoid accountability for war, disease, food & fuel prices, unconstitutional/illegal federal job cuts, Immigration and Customs Enforcement killings, and the list goes on growing by the day. We must continue to keep a light on the truth while this unwelcome darkness fueled by greed passes through. The world is watching, and I'd like to believe most are keeping us in prayer.



    United Nations | Peace, dignity and equality on a healthy planet


    In a Mildly Corrupt Regime, Government by the People Undermines Government of and for the People


    Instagram


    Wednesday, July 29, 2026

    “If There Is No Struggle, There Is No Progress” - Frederick Douglass

     

    Frederick Douglas (Abolitionist)

    The following is an excerpt from his August 3, 1857, speech at Canandaigua, New York.


    Those who profess to favor freedom and yet deprecate agitation are men who want crops without plowing up the ground; they want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters.

    This struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, and it may be both moral and physical, but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. 

    Find out just what any people will quietly submit to, and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.



    Tuesday, July 28, 2026

    Sunday, July 19, 2026

    Invictus Poem Dangerous to Catholic Faith?

     

    "Invictus" by William Ernest Henley

    Out of the night that covers me,

    Black as the pit from pole to pole,

    I thank whatever gods may be

    For my unconquerable soul.


    In the fell clutch of circumstance

    I have not winced nor cried aloud.

    Under the bludgeonings of chance

    My head is bloody, but unbowed.


    Beyond this place of wrath and tears

    Looms but the Horror of the shade,

    And yet the menace of the years

    Finds and shall find me unafraid.


    It matters not how strait the gate,

    How charged with punishments the scroll,

    I am the master of my fate,

    I am the captain of my soul.


    – William Ernest Henley, 1875



    Marc Sims - Bible, theology, culture, etc.

    One of the most popular poems in the West today (particularly the last two lines), William Ernest Henley’s Invictus is a kind of reverie and praise of the rugged individual who refuses to let the circumstances of life crush them.


    From the age of 12 Henley had tuberculosis of the bone and suffered tremendously, eventually resulting in his left leg being amputated when he was 17. He spent the remainder of his life in and out of hospitals, under the constant threat of having his other leg amputated, and eventually died from the illness at the age of 53. As an avowed atheist the only solace and strength Henley could look to for comfort amidst a life of suffering was within himself. At the age of 27, while Henley was laid up in a hospital, he wrote Invictus, latin for “unconquerable.” It has become well known, along with Rudyard Kipling’s If, as the quintessential picture of the stoic manly virtue of Victorian England.


    The poem’s influence has been considerable. Nelson Mandela famously recited this poem while in prison, looking to it as a beacon of hope. It was also the last words of Timothy McVeigh before he received a lethal injection after killing 168 people in the Oklahoma City bombing. For good and ill, the “unconquerable soul” of Henley has resonated with many.


    Better to Reign in Hell

    Each of the four verses strikes a note of defiance. The only nod Henley gives to a power above him is a reference to “whatever gods may be” who give to him his “unconquerable soul.” The rest of the poem positions himself in active resistance not only to the circumstances of his life, but to any kind of higher power over him, whether that be chance (verse 2), death (verse 3), or the Christian God (verse 4). In each verse he is beset by darkness, bludgeoning, horrors, and punishments, yet stands unafraid and undaunted: Invictus.


    The last verse in particular is a scandalous slap in the face of Christianity. Henley rejected belief in God, but even if the Christian God exists it matters not. The “straight gate” is an allusion to Jesus’ teaching in Matthew 7, “Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in threat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it,” (Matt 7:13-14, KJV). To reject the narrow path of Christ is to plunge yourself into destruction and judgment. But Henley, so to speak, cries out: bring it on. The “scroll” charged with punishments is likely a reference to the book of judgment in Revelation 20:11-15. Henley is not intimidated by threat of punishment or judgment, for he is the captain and master of his fate, not an Eternal Judge. In other words, he would rather take the punishments of the scroll and maintain his autonomy and control, then become submissive and compliant. It reminds one of Satan’s confession in Milton’s Paradise Lost: “Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven.”


    Illusory Independence

    While there is something commendable about a kind of courage that is willing to face down overwhelming odds, the kind of independence and autonomy Henley portrays in Invictus is imaginary, dangerous, and exhausting.


    It is imaginary because no one is able to defy the circumstances of life. We do have some power to choose how we respond to the events in life, but no one is the master of their fate. We have no control over what happens to us, what other people will do, or the situations which providence finds us. I did not choose the family I was born into, when I was born, my genetic makeup, or what is happening in the world around me. Further, while Henley purports to say that it “matters not how strait the gate / how charged with punishments the scroll” at judgment day, it does matter. Henley’s hubris is staggering. At the last day he will not be defiantly standing against the God of the universe saying: I don’t care, bring it on. No, he will be on his face confessing that Christ is the Master and Captain (Phil 2:10-11) before begging the mountains to fall upon him (Rev 6:15-17).


    It is dangerous because it removes any authority from outside or above the individual and places the authority within, I am the captain of my soul. Some people look within and find virtue (Mandela), and others find ugliness (McVeigh). But if the heavens above and circumstance around us cannot bow our heads, then what will? When McVeigh killed 168 people, he saw himself as the “master of his fate” and “captain of his soul”–he saw himself as the hero, defiant, and undaunted. And, since the worldview of Invictus loads the individual with authority, who are we to say otherwise? That is dangerous.


    Lastly, it is exhausting because it forces you to become your own savior. You cannot look outside of yourself for strength or help. It is you against the world, against the heavens, against death. And that is a heavy burden. What if death approaches and you do not find yourself fitting the 27-year-old’s description of being “unafraid”? Too bad. You have no one and nothing else to help you.


    Dorothy Day, the 20th century Catholic worker, wrote a poem in response to this worldview fittingly titled Conquered:

    Conquered

    Out of the light that dazzles me,

    Bright as the sun from pole to pole,

    I thank the God I know to be,

    For Christ – the Conqueror of my soul.


    Since His the sway of circumstance,

    I would not wince nor cry aloud.

    Under the rule which men call chance,

    My head, with joy, is humbly bowed.


    Beyond this place of sin and tears,

    That Life with Him and His the Aid,

    That, spite the menace of the years,

    Keeps, and will keep me unafraid.


    I have no fear though straight the gate:

    He cleared from punishment the scroll.

    Christ is the Master of my fate!

    Christ is the Captain of my soul!


    Dorothy Day (November 8, 1897 – November 29, 1980) was an American journalist, social activist and anarchist who, after a bohemian youth, became a Catholic without abandoning her social activism. She was perhaps the best-known political radical among American Catholics.


    Journey to Sainthood: Dorothy Day

    Lovely comic depiction of "Invictus" by Sir William Ernest Henley.  : r/Poetry




    Saturday, July 18, 2026

    Is Vitello the Giants Biggest Liability?

    Buster Posey seems to have his mind made up on Tony Vitello's future with SF Giants

    After watching yet another Giants late inning give away moments ago, I am convinced that rookie MLB Manager Tony Vitello is still learning how to manage games in the big leagues. While he is trying to figure it all out (lineup, opposition, strategy, and key moments in a game) this battling Giants team appears to be a well-built ship with an inexperienced captain at the helm.

    Sure, hitters and pitchers had a challenging first half. But watching pitching ace Logan Webb give up a tying three-run homerun in the bottom of the 7th inning with two outs against the Mariners proved to me the captain is still sleep/inexperienced at the wheel. Webb clearly struggled while trying to reestablish his dominance after a hit-by-pitch and a walk. There was no mound visit to check on Webb or just give him a break at 80+ pitches. Experience, just from the first half failures, dictates something be done BEFORE the opposition jumps on you.

    But what do I know, I've never played or managed in an MLB game. What I do see while sitting back watching my flat screen is a repetitive pattern where the Giants dominate early then "Things Fall Apart." 

    And here we are again. Seattle Mariners Pitcher Andres Munoz just sat down three giants with two looking strike outs and one ground ball. He did it on nine pitches averaging 98 mph (five of them 100 or 101). Things have fallen apart!

    Mariners are batting in the bottom of the ninth inning. If the Giants are lucky, they'll get it into extra innings. So, it has come to wishing this team luck when trying to close out or finish off an opponent. The Giants team that won three world series in the 2010's were torturous to watch. This 2026 team has clearly given new meaning to torture in SF Giants Baseball. And the final outcome has become brutally predictable.

    Where the hell is Liam Neeson when your team is being kidnapped?


    GOOD LUCK GIANTS!!!

    Giants vs. Mariners (Jul 18, 2026) Box Score - ESPN